If the Jazz trade AK to the Denver Freakin' Nuggets, and get back Boris Freakin' Diaw...
I. WILL. RIOT.
That is all.
Friday, September 24, 2010
Thursday, July 15, 2010
What a difference a couple of days can make
Wow. The last 48 hours for the Utah Jazz have been crazy and exciting. Just 3 days ago this offseason was looking like it could end up being the most disappointing one I could remember. Boozer gone (which I was glad about, but with no prospects to replace him with I was worried), Korver gone, Matthews likely gone. I felt like the Jazz had taken a massive step backwards. I was trying to look on the bright side, thinking about next year's lottery pick -- I was sure the Jazz couldn't make the playoffs in 2011.
And now? So much has changed.
First, the Jazz were able to work things out with Chicago to do a sign-and-trade for Boozer. By signing Boozer and then immediately trading him to Chicago, the Jazz obtained a Traded Player Exception (TPE) which is basically an exception to the rule that states that the salaries of the player or players who are traded away must match the salaries of the player(s) brought in. With the TPE, the Jazz could obtain a player via trade without having to send back matching salaries. They used the TPE to bring in Al Jefferson from the Minnesota Timberwolves.
Al is a 6'10" Center/Power Forward. He was the key piece that Boston sent to Minnesota in the blockbuster trade that netted the Celtics Kevin Garnett. Al was the piece that made losing KG ok. He puts up great numbers -- which I believe will be even better here in Utah. He was really the only good player the T'Wolves had, so teams would zero in on him, double-team him, and make his job tough. They won't be able to play him that way here. The Jazz have too many other weapons. Al isn't known for his defense, but he blocks more shots than Boozer or Okur, and he's longer than either of them as well. But perhaps the most important thing is this:
In a text-message conversation with Paul the other day, he said something that I completely agree with: keeping Deron Williams happy should be the number 1 priority. He's the one guy that is truly irreplaceable on this team. His contract is up in 2 more years, and if we want him to re-sign, the Jazz as an organization has to show him that they will do whatever it takes to become a contender. Deron likes what he sees in Al Jefferson, and that says a lot to me. I think Al will fit right in here in Utah, and give the Jazz a true low-post back-to-the-basket type player. I love this trade.
But...
The one thing that I didn't love about it was that Al's $13+ million contract put the Jazz into the luxury tax, meaning that the likelihood of matching Portland's ridiculous offer sheet to Wes Matthews was slim to none. With the addition of Jefferson, the Jazz were a playoff team again. But without a guy like Wes, they weren't a contender. In order to really be seen as a contender the Jazz needed a guy who was:
But then, a miracle happened. Somehow, even though the "experts" and the "sources" all said that he had narrowed it down to San Antonio and Los Angeles, Raja Bell signed a 3 year, $9.8 million contract with the Utah Jazz.
Many will remember Raja from the 2 year stint he played with the Jazz from 2003 to 2005. I was on my mission the entire time he was on the team, so I never got to see him in a Jazz uniform. Bell is known for being one of the best perimeter and one-on-one defenders in the league -- particularly against one Kobe Bryant. He doesn't take any crap from anybody -- and he doesn't let anyone get away with pushing his teammates around (ala Malone, Harpring) Who could forget his infamous clothesline play? I could watch that all day... Bell is also a fantastic 3-point shooter. He has shot 41% from 3 throughout his career, and 46% in the playoffs. His percentages are actually higher than both Korver and one Jeff Hornacek. From what I understand, when the Jazz were having their struggles during a miserable few seasons, Bell was the one urging his teammates on, trying to stir them up and get them to give a whole effort. When it became official that the Jazz would not make the playoffs, Bell said, "So what, we didn't make the playoffs? We still have a job to do. We can still go out and beat teams just to say we beat them." This attitude is the epitome of Jerry Sloan's oft repeated words, "We can't start feeling sorry for ourselves".
Bell covers all four of the needs that I mentioned above, but he also brings something that the Jazz have been in need of -- veteran leadership. Raja is 33 years old and has been deep into the playoffs. He understands what it takes to win, and he can help shoulder some of the team-leadership responsibilities that have rested solely on Deron's shoulders for the last several years (because, let's face it, no matter how many times Boozer said "I'm the leader of this team", he was never a leader. If you have to say you're the leader in order for people to know it, you're not convincing anyone.) Derek Fisher (let's not get into that now...) was a veteran player and provided leadership and experience in the Jazz locker room when he was on the team. It's no coincidence that that year was when the Jazz made it to the Western Conference Finals. Hopefully Raja can help fill that void.
The future for the Jazz is looking bright. I can't believe how things have shaped up over the past couple days, but it has me very excited to see what this team can do this season. Go JAZZ!!
And now? So much has changed.
First, the Jazz were able to work things out with Chicago to do a sign-and-trade for Boozer. By signing Boozer and then immediately trading him to Chicago, the Jazz obtained a Traded Player Exception (TPE) which is basically an exception to the rule that states that the salaries of the player or players who are traded away must match the salaries of the player(s) brought in. With the TPE, the Jazz could obtain a player via trade without having to send back matching salaries. They used the TPE to bring in Al Jefferson from the Minnesota Timberwolves.
Al is a 6'10" Center/Power Forward. He was the key piece that Boston sent to Minnesota in the blockbuster trade that netted the Celtics Kevin Garnett. Al was the piece that made losing KG ok. He puts up great numbers -- which I believe will be even better here in Utah. He was really the only good player the T'Wolves had, so teams would zero in on him, double-team him, and make his job tough. They won't be able to play him that way here. The Jazz have too many other weapons. Al isn't known for his defense, but he blocks more shots than Boozer or Okur, and he's longer than either of them as well. But perhaps the most important thing is this:
 |
| via twitter.com/tribjazz |
But...
The one thing that I didn't love about it was that Al's $13+ million contract put the Jazz into the luxury tax, meaning that the likelihood of matching Portland's ridiculous offer sheet to Wes Matthews was slim to none. With the addition of Jefferson, the Jazz were a playoff team again. But without a guy like Wes, they weren't a contender. In order to really be seen as a contender the Jazz needed a guy who was:
- A consistent outside shooter.
- A lock-down defender.
- A tough, hard working, team player.
- Someone they could afford.
But then, a miracle happened. Somehow, even though the "experts" and the "sources" all said that he had narrowed it down to San Antonio and Los Angeles, Raja Bell signed a 3 year, $9.8 million contract with the Utah Jazz.
Many will remember Raja from the 2 year stint he played with the Jazz from 2003 to 2005. I was on my mission the entire time he was on the team, so I never got to see him in a Jazz uniform. Bell is known for being one of the best perimeter and one-on-one defenders in the league -- particularly against one Kobe Bryant. He doesn't take any crap from anybody -- and he doesn't let anyone get away with pushing his teammates around (ala Malone, Harpring) Who could forget his infamous clothesline play? I could watch that all day... Bell is also a fantastic 3-point shooter. He has shot 41% from 3 throughout his career, and 46% in the playoffs. His percentages are actually higher than both Korver and one Jeff Hornacek. From what I understand, when the Jazz were having their struggles during a miserable few seasons, Bell was the one urging his teammates on, trying to stir them up and get them to give a whole effort. When it became official that the Jazz would not make the playoffs, Bell said, "So what, we didn't make the playoffs? We still have a job to do. We can still go out and beat teams just to say we beat them." This attitude is the epitome of Jerry Sloan's oft repeated words, "We can't start feeling sorry for ourselves".
Bell covers all four of the needs that I mentioned above, but he also brings something that the Jazz have been in need of -- veteran leadership. Raja is 33 years old and has been deep into the playoffs. He understands what it takes to win, and he can help shoulder some of the team-leadership responsibilities that have rested solely on Deron's shoulders for the last several years (because, let's face it, no matter how many times Boozer said "I'm the leader of this team", he was never a leader. If you have to say you're the leader in order for people to know it, you're not convincing anyone.) Derek Fisher (let's not get into that now...) was a veteran player and provided leadership and experience in the Jazz locker room when he was on the team. It's no coincidence that that year was when the Jazz made it to the Western Conference Finals. Hopefully Raja can help fill that void.
The future for the Jazz is looking bright. I can't believe how things have shaped up over the past couple days, but it has me very excited to see what this team can do this season. Go JAZZ!!
Saturday, July 10, 2010
I totally called this...
Well, Kevin O'Connor, you just don't learn your lesson, do you? I just KNEW this was going to happen. The Portland Trailblazers have signed Wesley Matthews to a massive, front loaded offer sheet. How does this make any sense at all for Portland? They have one of the best shooting guards in the NBA -- Brandon Roy. So they really want to pay their backup SG $9.2 million next year? No, I don't think so. They did this because they like to screw the Jazz. My guess is that they're banking on the Jazz matching the offer.
I've made my position known. I want to keep Wes. But wow -- 9.2 million dollars?! This just sucks. I hate Portland.
I've made my position known. I want to keep Wes. But wow -- 9.2 million dollars?! This just sucks. I hate Portland.
Friday, July 9, 2010
Free Agency Update
We're a week into the free agency period and several contracts have already been inked. Some of my predictions were right, some were wrong, and some are still yet to be determined.
I was right about Chris Bosh and Dwayne Wade teaming up in Miami. However, I did not think LeBron would be joining them. I guess I underestimated how big of a jerk he is. Not only did he turn his back on the town and the people he grew up with, but he made a ridiculous spectacle of the whole thing. I had no idea how self-absorbed, narcissistic, and pompous he is. I've never had a problem with Dwayne Wade or Chris Bosh, but now I just hope that experiment fails miserably. I hope their egos are too big to coexist on the same team. I hope karma comes back to bite LeBron.
As far as our own free agents...
When it comes to Boozer, I am actually pleasantly surprised. All signs indicated that the Front Office intended to keep him around. And while the ideal situation would have been to work out a sign and trade to bring in a player to fill a need, I'm satisfied with the trade exemption the Jazz received in the transaction. (That being said, I wish the Jazz would have traded Boozer last summer, or last season before the trade deadline so that we could have gotten a player in return.) The trade exemption allows the Jazz to make a trade and bring in a player (or players) for salary equal to what Boozer will make in his first year in Chicago (+- $100K). Without the exemption, the Jazz would have only been able to offer a player part of their Mid-Level exemption -- whatever portion is left after re-signing Matthews. The trade exemption only benefits us if we use it, so I truly hope the Jazz don't sit on their hands. There are players we could go after, but we have to act fast. Both Toronto and Cleveland have significant amounts of cap space now that they've lost Bosh and James. If we don't act, someone else will. My prime target would be Al Jefferson. The T-Wolves just acquired Michael Beasley, and rumor is they are trying to unload Jefferson to relieve salary (since they offered Gay a big fat contract). Jefferson could thrive in the Jazz's system, and I'd love to see him here.
Sadly, I was also right about Korver. It was announced today that he'll be joining Carlos Boozer in Chicago. I appreciate everything he did for the Jazz and for the community. I wish him nothing but the best.
So now we have to wait and see. My guess is that Portland will make a pitch to Wes Matthews, which the Jazz will match. I think they'll most likely bring back Fesenko as well, since we'll need a center with Memo hurt. Besides, I haven't heard any talk about teams being interested in Fes.
I'd love to see the Jazz go all in and make some big moves. Bring in another scorer, a big, a shooter, etc. I can only imagine how D-Will is reacting to all of this. He sees his team getting worse -- losing a productive (sometimes) player in Boozer, and a consistent outside threat that spreads the floor. He's probably frustrated right now and anxious for management to bring in some help. I hope they can do it. At the end of the season, he said that this team keeps doing the exact same thing and expecting different results. And it's true. For the most part, the roster hasn't changed over the last 3 seasons, and the Jazz have been eliminated by the Lakers 3 years in a row. But management has seemed content to just stand pat and hope things get better. Now that Boozer and Korver are gone, I think this kind of forces their hand. They HAVE to do something now, or risk losing their franchise player in two years when his contract is up. I wish Larry was still here. He had more passion for the Jazz in his little finger than Greg has in his entire being. I just hope they do something.
I was right about Chris Bosh and Dwayne Wade teaming up in Miami. However, I did not think LeBron would be joining them. I guess I underestimated how big of a jerk he is. Not only did he turn his back on the town and the people he grew up with, but he made a ridiculous spectacle of the whole thing. I had no idea how self-absorbed, narcissistic, and pompous he is. I've never had a problem with Dwayne Wade or Chris Bosh, but now I just hope that experiment fails miserably. I hope their egos are too big to coexist on the same team. I hope karma comes back to bite LeBron.
As far as our own free agents...
When it comes to Boozer, I am actually pleasantly surprised. All signs indicated that the Front Office intended to keep him around. And while the ideal situation would have been to work out a sign and trade to bring in a player to fill a need, I'm satisfied with the trade exemption the Jazz received in the transaction. (That being said, I wish the Jazz would have traded Boozer last summer, or last season before the trade deadline so that we could have gotten a player in return.) The trade exemption allows the Jazz to make a trade and bring in a player (or players) for salary equal to what Boozer will make in his first year in Chicago (+- $100K). Without the exemption, the Jazz would have only been able to offer a player part of their Mid-Level exemption -- whatever portion is left after re-signing Matthews. The trade exemption only benefits us if we use it, so I truly hope the Jazz don't sit on their hands. There are players we could go after, but we have to act fast. Both Toronto and Cleveland have significant amounts of cap space now that they've lost Bosh and James. If we don't act, someone else will. My prime target would be Al Jefferson. The T-Wolves just acquired Michael Beasley, and rumor is they are trying to unload Jefferson to relieve salary (since they offered Gay a big fat contract). Jefferson could thrive in the Jazz's system, and I'd love to see him here.
Sadly, I was also right about Korver. It was announced today that he'll be joining Carlos Boozer in Chicago. I appreciate everything he did for the Jazz and for the community. I wish him nothing but the best.
So now we have to wait and see. My guess is that Portland will make a pitch to Wes Matthews, which the Jazz will match. I think they'll most likely bring back Fesenko as well, since we'll need a center with Memo hurt. Besides, I haven't heard any talk about teams being interested in Fes.
I'd love to see the Jazz go all in and make some big moves. Bring in another scorer, a big, a shooter, etc. I can only imagine how D-Will is reacting to all of this. He sees his team getting worse -- losing a productive (sometimes) player in Boozer, and a consistent outside threat that spreads the floor. He's probably frustrated right now and anxious for management to bring in some help. I hope they can do it. At the end of the season, he said that this team keeps doing the exact same thing and expecting different results. And it's true. For the most part, the roster hasn't changed over the last 3 seasons, and the Jazz have been eliminated by the Lakers 3 years in a row. But management has seemed content to just stand pat and hope things get better. Now that Boozer and Korver are gone, I think this kind of forces their hand. They HAVE to do something now, or risk losing their franchise player in two years when his contract is up. I wish Larry was still here. He had more passion for the Jazz in his little finger than Greg has in his entire being. I just hope they do something.
Thursday, July 1, 2010
The Offseason
July first has arrived. Today is the day that NBA teams can begin to court free agents. Of course, if you don't think organizations have been in under-the-table discussions with players' agents for weeks, you are a bit naive as to how things are done in the NBA.
Now that the free agent market is officially open for business, I'd like to make some predictions about the Jazz's free agents, as well as some of the other high-profile FA's in the league.
Utah Jazz
Free Agents: C Kyrylo Fesenko (restricted), G Wesley Matthews (restricted), F Carlos Boozer (unrestricted), F/G Kyle Korver (unrestricted)
The Jazz sent qualifying offers to both Wesley Matthews and Kyrylo Fesenko, meaning that they can match any offer either player receives. I don't particularly like being in this position. To me it means that the Jazz are really hoping to keep them both (especially Wes), but if that's the case -- why not try and get something worked out and in the books before July 1st? Now we're at the mercy of other teams. This is what happened last season with Paul Millsap, and the same thing happened a year earlier with CJ Miles. CJ signed an offer sheet with OKC, and the Jazz matched. Paul signed an offer sheet with Portland, and the Jazz matched. The frustrating thing about this is that CJ ended up getting overpaid, and some argue that Paul Millsap did as well. I think Millsap is worth every penny he's making and more, but his contract did hurt us last year because Portland intentionally made it a very front-loaded deal (meaning Paul makes more in the first year of the contract than he will for the other 3 years). It put us over the cap and we had to give up Maynor and Brewer in cost-cutting moves.
My guess is that we will end up re-signing both of these players, but don't be surprised if someone else makes them an offer first.
As for Korver, I think the writing is pretty much on the wall. Sad to say it, but I think he's gone. When the Jazz drafted Gordon Hayward -- a guy who plays Kyle's postion, and has a similar skill-set -- they basically were broadcasting to the fan base that they had no intention of going after Korver. The reality is, I don't think we can really afford him. Several teams will be interested after Kover set a new record for 3-Point % in a season. The Jazz should have calculated how much revenue will be lost now that no more pink Kyle Korver jerseys will be sold. I'd imagine the Jazz's female fanbase will take a significant hit. Joking aside, I really like Korver and I'll be sad if he goes. He's been a great player and always given 100%, and what's more, he's been a huge part of the community.
And then there's Boozer. Oy vey. Reports indicate that the Jazz are making it a priority to bring him back... Are you kidding me?! Look. Boozer is capable of being a dominant PF in this league. But the fact is, he is not the answer for the Jazz. I don't want to spend a lot of time making a case against Boozer, so I'll just say this. You can't do the same thing over and over and over and expect a different result. If the Jazz re-sign him, Boozer will miss a significant number of games over a 5 or 6 year contract, the Jazz will win between 45 and 50 games each year, consistently lose to the Lakers, probably make the playoffs (but without home-court), and more than likely exit in the first round. And the sad thing is, I'm pretty sure the front office is just fine with that.
One idea that I've heard tossed around is to work out a sign & trade with Boozer. The scenario is that the Jazz sign Boozer and immediately trade him to Orlando for Marcin Gortat + either JJ Redick or Ryan Anderson. Works for me. Gortat is probably the best back-up center in the league, and could start on a lot of teams. His number won't wow you, but remember he's playing behind Dwight Howard. He would bring a 6'11" defensive player with deep playoff experience to the team. Redick could fill the role of the departing Korver (the basketball role -- not the heart throb role). But this is just one of many rumors that are floating around.
The hype surrounding his free agency has been almost as obnoxious as Kobe's angry under-bite face. But I'm not convinced... My guess is, in the end, he'll end up signing with Cleveland. I just don't really see him abandoning his home state and the fans who love him. However, if he does decide to leave, I think New York is his most likely destination.
I know this is going to sound boring, but I don't think he's going anywhere either. I think he'll continue to be part of the Miami Heat, and possibly end up playing his entire career there.
I think he's Miami bound. Just a feeling I've got, but I think he and Wade will team up.
So there -- that's what I think. We'll see how it all plays out over the summer.
Now that the free agent market is officially open for business, I'd like to make some predictions about the Jazz's free agents, as well as some of the other high-profile FA's in the league.
Utah Jazz
Free Agents: C Kyrylo Fesenko (restricted), G Wesley Matthews (restricted), F Carlos Boozer (unrestricted), F/G Kyle Korver (unrestricted)
The Jazz sent qualifying offers to both Wesley Matthews and Kyrylo Fesenko, meaning that they can match any offer either player receives. I don't particularly like being in this position. To me it means that the Jazz are really hoping to keep them both (especially Wes), but if that's the case -- why not try and get something worked out and in the books before July 1st? Now we're at the mercy of other teams. This is what happened last season with Paul Millsap, and the same thing happened a year earlier with CJ Miles. CJ signed an offer sheet with OKC, and the Jazz matched. Paul signed an offer sheet with Portland, and the Jazz matched. The frustrating thing about this is that CJ ended up getting overpaid, and some argue that Paul Millsap did as well. I think Millsap is worth every penny he's making and more, but his contract did hurt us last year because Portland intentionally made it a very front-loaded deal (meaning Paul makes more in the first year of the contract than he will for the other 3 years). It put us over the cap and we had to give up Maynor and Brewer in cost-cutting moves.
My guess is that we will end up re-signing both of these players, but don't be surprised if someone else makes them an offer first.
As for Korver, I think the writing is pretty much on the wall. Sad to say it, but I think he's gone. When the Jazz drafted Gordon Hayward -- a guy who plays Kyle's postion, and has a similar skill-set -- they basically were broadcasting to the fan base that they had no intention of going after Korver. The reality is, I don't think we can really afford him. Several teams will be interested after Kover set a new record for 3-Point % in a season. The Jazz should have calculated how much revenue will be lost now that no more pink Kyle Korver jerseys will be sold. I'd imagine the Jazz's female fanbase will take a significant hit. Joking aside, I really like Korver and I'll be sad if he goes. He's been a great player and always given 100%, and what's more, he's been a huge part of the community.
And then there's Boozer. Oy vey. Reports indicate that the Jazz are making it a priority to bring him back... Are you kidding me?! Look. Boozer is capable of being a dominant PF in this league. But the fact is, he is not the answer for the Jazz. I don't want to spend a lot of time making a case against Boozer, so I'll just say this. You can't do the same thing over and over and over and expect a different result. If the Jazz re-sign him, Boozer will miss a significant number of games over a 5 or 6 year contract, the Jazz will win between 45 and 50 games each year, consistently lose to the Lakers, probably make the playoffs (but without home-court), and more than likely exit in the first round. And the sad thing is, I'm pretty sure the front office is just fine with that.
One idea that I've heard tossed around is to work out a sign & trade with Boozer. The scenario is that the Jazz sign Boozer and immediately trade him to Orlando for Marcin Gortat + either JJ Redick or Ryan Anderson. Works for me. Gortat is probably the best back-up center in the league, and could start on a lot of teams. His number won't wow you, but remember he's playing behind Dwight Howard. He would bring a 6'11" defensive player with deep playoff experience to the team. Redick could fill the role of the departing Korver (the basketball role -- not the heart throb role). But this is just one of many rumors that are floating around.
LeBron James
The hype surrounding his free agency has been almost as obnoxious as Kobe's angry under-bite face. But I'm not convinced... My guess is, in the end, he'll end up signing with Cleveland. I just don't really see him abandoning his home state and the fans who love him. However, if he does decide to leave, I think New York is his most likely destination.
Dwayne Wade
I know this is going to sound boring, but I don't think he's going anywhere either. I think he'll continue to be part of the Miami Heat, and possibly end up playing his entire career there.
Chris Bosh
I think he's Miami bound. Just a feeling I've got, but I think he and Wade will team up.
So there -- that's what I think. We'll see how it all plays out over the summer.
Thursday, June 24, 2010
Response to some silly comments...
Utah will become the 12th member of the Pacific Athletic Conference starting with the 2011-12 season. I plan to write another post expressing my thoughts on this, but right now, I just want to address some things. A lot has been said about this situation. I'd like to respond to some of the statements that have been made. Some of the names have been omitted to protect the ignorant... ;)
"Utah good for six years, BYU good for 30? Who gets invited to the Pac 10? Oh yeah, Utah..... This whole religious bigotry crap is really getting on my nerves!!" -- Random Facebook Friend
Strictly in terms of football -- if any non-BCS team deserved to be invited to a BCS league, it was Utah. The only other program that could possibly state that they should have been invited would be Boise State. But Utah's 2004 season when they totally annihilated everyone they played, combined with their 2008 campaign filled with gut-it-out type wins and a thrashing of Alabama clearly overshadow Boise's gimmicks and trick plays. Since the beginning of the BCS era, Utah has had more success against BCS teams than any other non-BCS school. And Utah holds the nation's longest active bowl win-streak at 9 straight victories.
But this move isn't just about football. Although Utah's basketball program has seen a couple of less-than-impressive seasons recently, they still rank in the top 20 in the nation in all-time win%. In womens gymnastics (which is important to the PAC), Utah has one of the most successful programs in the country, boasting multiple national championships.
But this move isn't just about athletics. Utah is considered a prestigious research university. Developments such as the first artificial human heart (1982), and multiple advances in cancer research (Huntsman Cancer Institute) have taken place at the University of Utah. Utah has a very respected and competitive medical school. These things are important to the PAC, and were factors in their decision to invite Utah to join their conference.
No one can say that BYU doesn't have a good football program. But the most impressive thing they've done since I turned 1 year old is beat a mediocre Oklahoma team. No one cares about 10 win seasons. No one cares about MWC championships. They want to see you win the BIG games. Run the table. Pound a perennial powerhouse into the ground. You're not going to turn any heads winning the Vegas bowl.
And while BYU is a fine institution, they are in no way a research university. They don't even have a medical school. They just don't fit the mold of the PAC. But as for the comment about religious bigotry, I'll address that next...
Dick Harmon -- writer for the Deseret News and notorious BYU homer -- was interviewed by ESPN. They asked him why Utah was invited to the PAC. His response:
"Primarily, [because] they were not BYU and they were not tied to the LDS church -- or the Mormons -- and that's probably the bottom line. BYU has better facilities, a bigger football stadium, umm... the last 40 years of better tradition in football, and they've just dominated the Mountain West Conference, and the WAC conference in total athletic supremacy, uh, for decades."
Poor Dick. Maybe he misunderstood the question. He was asked why Utah was invited to the PAC, and instead of answering that, he threw himself and Cougar nation a little pity party. Clearly Dick, my FB friend above, and many other BYU faithful feel that the one and only reason that BYU was not invited over Utah is because of their religious affiliation. They were discriminated against because they're the Mormons.
So here's my response to that. False. I've already responded to most of what Dick said above, but I really grow weary of BYU peeps playing the religion card. "We're at a disadvantage in recruiting because of our honor code!" "We're at a disadvantage because our good recruits leave on missions and lose some of their athletic ability due to 2 years without playing!" Blah, blah blah. Waaa, waaa, waaa. Yep, you're a church-owned private school. What do you expect? Quit griping about it. BYU should be proud of the church. They should be proud of their honor code, and proud of their players for putting athletic careers on hold to serve missions. But more often I hear it discussed as something that handicaps their athletic programs.
I'm sure part -- a very small part -- of the PAC's decision was due to the fact that BYU doesn't play on Sundays (well, until they get to the NFL that is...), which is usually part of the PAC schedule for multiple sports. BYU has this entitlement complex. It's like saying, "PAC, you should invite us to your conference AND accommodate us and change how you do things so that we fit in, because we're BYU!" Sorry guys, that's just not how it works. And that doesn't make other people bigots.
Anyway, I've never been able to read more than a few lines of Dick Harmon's articles, and this interview really irritated me. Grow up and try to be a little professional next time, Dick.
"Utah good for six years, BYU good for 30? Who gets invited to the Pac 10? Oh yeah, Utah..... This whole religious bigotry crap is really getting on my nerves!!" -- Random Facebook Friend
Strictly in terms of football -- if any non-BCS team deserved to be invited to a BCS league, it was Utah. The only other program that could possibly state that they should have been invited would be Boise State. But Utah's 2004 season when they totally annihilated everyone they played, combined with their 2008 campaign filled with gut-it-out type wins and a thrashing of Alabama clearly overshadow Boise's gimmicks and trick plays. Since the beginning of the BCS era, Utah has had more success against BCS teams than any other non-BCS school. And Utah holds the nation's longest active bowl win-streak at 9 straight victories.
But this move isn't just about football. Although Utah's basketball program has seen a couple of less-than-impressive seasons recently, they still rank in the top 20 in the nation in all-time win%. In womens gymnastics (which is important to the PAC), Utah has one of the most successful programs in the country, boasting multiple national championships.
But this move isn't just about athletics. Utah is considered a prestigious research university. Developments such as the first artificial human heart (1982), and multiple advances in cancer research (Huntsman Cancer Institute) have taken place at the University of Utah. Utah has a very respected and competitive medical school. These things are important to the PAC, and were factors in their decision to invite Utah to join their conference.
No one can say that BYU doesn't have a good football program. But the most impressive thing they've done since I turned 1 year old is beat a mediocre Oklahoma team. No one cares about 10 win seasons. No one cares about MWC championships. They want to see you win the BIG games. Run the table. Pound a perennial powerhouse into the ground. You're not going to turn any heads winning the Vegas bowl.
And while BYU is a fine institution, they are in no way a research university. They don't even have a medical school. They just don't fit the mold of the PAC. But as for the comment about religious bigotry, I'll address that next...
Dick Harmon -- writer for the Deseret News and notorious BYU homer -- was interviewed by ESPN. They asked him why Utah was invited to the PAC. His response:
"Primarily, [because] they were not BYU and they were not tied to the LDS church -- or the Mormons -- and that's probably the bottom line. BYU has better facilities, a bigger football stadium, umm... the last 40 years of better tradition in football, and they've just dominated the Mountain West Conference, and the WAC conference in total athletic supremacy, uh, for decades."
Poor Dick. Maybe he misunderstood the question. He was asked why Utah was invited to the PAC, and instead of answering that, he threw himself and Cougar nation a little pity party. Clearly Dick, my FB friend above, and many other BYU faithful feel that the one and only reason that BYU was not invited over Utah is because of their religious affiliation. They were discriminated against because they're the Mormons.
So here's my response to that. False. I've already responded to most of what Dick said above, but I really grow weary of BYU peeps playing the religion card. "We're at a disadvantage in recruiting because of our honor code!" "We're at a disadvantage because our good recruits leave on missions and lose some of their athletic ability due to 2 years without playing!" Blah, blah blah. Waaa, waaa, waaa. Yep, you're a church-owned private school. What do you expect? Quit griping about it. BYU should be proud of the church. They should be proud of their honor code, and proud of their players for putting athletic careers on hold to serve missions. But more often I hear it discussed as something that handicaps their athletic programs.
I'm sure part -- a very small part -- of the PAC's decision was due to the fact that BYU doesn't play on Sundays (well, until they get to the NFL that is...), which is usually part of the PAC schedule for multiple sports. BYU has this entitlement complex. It's like saying, "PAC, you should invite us to your conference AND accommodate us and change how you do things so that we fit in, because we're BYU!" Sorry guys, that's just not how it works. And that doesn't make other people bigots.
Anyway, I've never been able to read more than a few lines of Dick Harmon's articles, and this interview really irritated me. Grow up and try to be a little professional next time, Dick.
Thursday, December 24, 2009
Trade Thoughts: If I were Kevin O'Connor...
So, it's pretty clear that the Jazz need to shake things up. Their recent trade (Eric Maynor and Matt Harpring to OKC for... nothing...) has some people scratching their heads. It makes sense to me, only from a purely financial point of view. Greg Miller made it clear at the beginning of the season that he was willing to bite the bullet and pay the luxury tax if that was what it would take to build a championship team. However, it's obvious that the Jazz -- as presently constituted -- are not even close to being a championship team. I'm guessing he's not as willing to pay the tax for a 8th seed, first round exit team. And I can't say I blame him. So, in order to dump Harpring's contract, the price was our impressive young rookie backup PG. I'm sad to see him go. (as a side note, I'm also sad we don't have Matt Harpring out there anymore, getting under people's skin and driving them crazy... I'll miss that guy.)
This trade, however, has left a vacancy on the Jazz's roster. Per NBA rules, teams are required to carry 13 players on their rosters, and we now only have 12. Does this mean another trade is in the works? Possibly a trade that will focus more on improving this team, rather than being purely a business move? Unfortunately, that is unlikely. As much as I'd like to hope that is the plan, it seems much more likely that the Jazz will call up someone from the D-League's Flash to fill the spot.
Nevertheless, it's fun to speculate on what could happen (however ridiculously unrealistic it might be...) In playing around with ESPN's NBA Trade Machine, I came up with this trade. I think it's a gem. Take a look:
Click HERE to enlarge
This trade, however, has left a vacancy on the Jazz's roster. Per NBA rules, teams are required to carry 13 players on their rosters, and we now only have 12. Does this mean another trade is in the works? Possibly a trade that will focus more on improving this team, rather than being purely a business move? Unfortunately, that is unlikely. As much as I'd like to hope that is the plan, it seems much more likely that the Jazz will call up someone from the D-League's Flash to fill the spot.
Nevertheless, it's fun to speculate on what could happen (however ridiculously unrealistic it might be...) In playing around with ESPN's NBA Trade Machine, I came up with this trade. I think it's a gem. Take a look:
Click HERE to enlargeAll in favor, please manifest. Any opposed, by the same sign? (Sit down, Brother Willey. I'm pretty sure you don't count anymore...)
Problem with trades is, the other team has to agree to it too. Darn.
Oh well.
Problem with trades is, the other team has to agree to it too. Darn.
Oh well.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
